In January 1994, the 27 local members voted to remove participation in SASMI from the collective agreement that Local 27 would negotiate before May 31. The president of Local 27 informed Averill in writing of the vote on 24 January 1994 and stated: "27 local members expect SASMI to comply with their claims for underemployment for 1993-B*, as well as the health/social benefits received against these 93 B benefits due". Averill responded by fax the same day stating that "the benefits would be forfeited from the moment local votes to eliminate SASMI were nullified." Also on January 24, Averill sent the proxies a memorandum informing them of the vote of the 27 local members. Generally speaking, you may not be working in the disqualification job that encompasses work in the sheet metal industry, as the MFN is a retirement plan that provides benefits to members who work in the sheet metal industry. The sheet metal industry has many different positions. If you are retired, do not jeopardize your benefit; Write to the MFN before accepting employment to ensure that it does not result in a suspension of benefits. Learn more about working after retirement. The contested forfeiture provisions were adopted in 1984 in the event of an amendment to SASMI`s rules and regulations. Prior to that date, the expiry provisions did not provide for the cessation of payment of benefits at the time when a local union made a decision to withdraw. In 1978, SASMI attempted to obtain a forfeiture of benefits against members of a local union, after the union agreed with some employers to remove the requirement for employers to pay contributions to SASMI under collective agreements that are expected to come into force in the future. The Minister of Labour has filed a complaint to hold directors liable for breach of trust obligations in the event of non-payment of benefits. Under these agreements, employers, on behalf of insured workers, paid contributions to the trust fund. .